In Information by Joseph Stiglitz, many important points are raised. One interesting notion is the idea of perfect versus imperfect information. "efficiency, full employment of resources, and uniform prices" are all things he lists under assumptions made about the concept of perfect information. Interestingly, he also makes several points about how certain things would simply not run without the information, such as arbitrage and equity. Without differences in price, profits could not be made, and without imaginary money within credit, a good deal of our transactions would simply not BE today.
Much of the world, I feel, operates on the basis of imperfect principles encapsulated within an idea of perfect principles. Copyright laws are made and are accepted based on the the idealized concept of intellectual property, like many laws. However, there are arguably many flaws in the definitions, and there is no perfection in making a definition that consolidates every individual's preconceived notions.
"Information is an activity.
Information is a life form.
Information is a relationship" (Barlow).
Information is defined based on how we attribute meaning to data, and that perception of attribution differs from person to person. General concepts have to be made on an abstract perfection to achieve communication, much like the functional economy discussed by Stiglitz, but everything about those concepts and how they operate is based in imperfection, fluctuation, and differences.

No comments:
Post a Comment